Insider Trading Investigation Dashboard

CORRECTION — July 2, 2026 — Six Scorpio Tankers (STNG) entries previously listed in this table have been corrected or removed. One entry (Okland, 6/22/26) was inflated by a value error: the Form 4 itself reports the aggregate sale price ($1,230,435 for 15,000 shares, per its own footnote) in the per-share price field, and the pipeline multiplied it a second time by share count — the reported $18.46 billion trade was actually $1,230,435. Five additional entries (Okland, Camerana, Henriksen, and a twice-filed Kumar Sujata Parekh award, all dated 5/4/26) were routine unvested equity compensation grants under the issuer's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan — no cash transaction occurred — carrying the same aggregate-as-price error ($626,025 notional each, not $4.7 billion). The Kumar entry appeared twice because the filer submitted a correcting refile of the same 7,500-share grant; the superseded row has been removed. All six entries have been corrected or removed, and the corrected Okland sale re-scored on its actual value. This Old Goat would rather publish the correction than let an $18 billion ghost sit in the table pretending to be a story.

STANDING METHODOLOGY NOTE — Some Form 4 filings report an aggregate transaction value in the per-share “price” field rather than a per-share price, and equity compensation grants can carry dollar figures despite no cash changing hands. Either can inflate a routine transaction into a nine- or ten-figure “trade.” The scraper now detects the aggregate-in-price signature at parse time, and every dataset build is scanned for the pattern that caught this one: an exact-duplicate dollar value appearing across multiple names, implausible implied per-share prices, and sales reported at $0.

SCORE METHODOLOGY — July 18, 2026 — Scores in this table are the output of the current detector build; the detector was rewritten July 1, 2026 (1,152 policy events, executive_trades.csv provenance) and the dataset rescored July 18, 2026. Scores can differ between detector versions even though the underlying trades, dates, and dollar values do not change — only the point-stacking rules do. Rows marked † are known cross-version divergences: dispatches published in early July cite James Litinsky’s top MP Materials entry as 17/20 under the July 1 methodology; the current build scores his top entry (May 12) 27/20. His April 20 entry briefly showed 29/20 because a STOCK_ACT_VIOLATION flag stacked onto it purely from date proximity to a congressional late-filings event — corrected July 18, 2026: Litinsky is a corporate executive, not a member of Congress; his disclosure obligations are SEC Form 4 timing rules, not the STOCK Act, and the flag (renamed STOCK_ACT_PROXIMITY) now applies only to people the STOCK Act actually covers. Treat cross-version score comparisons accordingly.